साचा:Article classification/doc

या साच्यात काही कठीण किंवा अवघड भाग आहेत. यात कोणताही बदल करण्यापूर्वी, याची माहिती काळजीपूर्वक वाचा. हा साचा बर्‍याच लेखात वापरला जात आहे. तुम्ही केलेल्या बदलांमुळे अनपेक्षित समस्या उद्भवल्यास, कृपया, आपले बदल त्वरीत काढून टाकावेत. तुम्ही या साच्यावर प्रयोग करून पाहू शकता परंतु, तुमचे प्रयोग जतन करण्याआधी ते जरुर तपासावेत. ते प्रयोग , धूळपाटी साचा‎ या पानांवर किंवा, तुमच्या सदस्य पानावर करून बघितल्यास विकिपीडियामधील पानांवर उत्पात होणार नाही.

Template layout

 
{{Article classification
 |project    = <!-- required -->
 |template   = 
   -or-        <!-- required, either term can be used -->
 |banner     = 
 |task_force = <!-- all fields are required if setting taskforce -->
  |tf_link   = 
  |parent    = 
  |tf_name   = 
 |title_size =
 |title_style= 
 |nocat      = 
}}

Usage

• project - sets the link to the project
• template or banner - sets the link to the project banner template. Sometimes the banner template is a shared template that is different than the project or uses a different name. Either |template= or |banner= can be used in this field.
• task_force - A "yes" in this field changes the wording and link structure to reflect a task force associated with the quality ratings.
  • tf_link - the name of the task force, use the name of the task force as defined in its wikilink - E.G. Wikipedia:WikiProject Foo/Bar task force.
  • parent - the name of the parent WikiProject, use the name of the project as defined in its wikilink - E.G. Wikipedia:WikiProject Foo/Bar task force.
  • tf_name - the name of the Taskforce, use the name of the task force as defined in its wikilink - E.G. Wikipedia:WikiProject Foo/Bar task force.
• title_size - This field allows changing of the font size in the title box of the template. The default is 12 pt.
• title_style - This field allows changes to the box style. Use standard CSS format, separated by a semi-colon (;).
• nocat - A "yes" in this field enables category suppression. Used when in situations where automatic categorization is not desired, such as here where the template is being shown in an example. Please see this essay for further explanation.

Basic example

{{Article classification
 |project    = Food and drink
 |banner     = Food and drink
 |nocat      = yes
}}

will generate:

Project home - WikiProject Food and drink

This page categorizes pages using assessment grades, through built-in transclusion from {{WikiProject Food and drink}}.

Information on Grading Scheme

मराठी विकिपीडिया लेख गुणवत्ता प्रतवारी योजना

दर्जा	निकष	वाचकांचे अनुभव	संपादनासाठी सूचना/सुचवण्या	उदाहरण
वृत्तलेख	या लेखाने featured article चा दर्जा प्राप्त केला आहे. More detailed criteria हा लेख वृत्तलेख निकष या दर्जापर्यंत पोचतो:विकिपीडिया:Featured article criteria	Professional, outstanding, and thorough; a definitive source for encyclopedic information.	No further content additions should be necessary unless new information becomes available; further improvements to the prose quality are often possible.	साचा:Oldid (as of March 2009)
अ	हा लेख चांगल्या प्रकारे संयोजित केला आहे व तो पूर्ण झाला आहे. त्याचे पुनरावलोकन हे इतर ठिकाणच्या निष्पक्ष समीक्षकांद्वारे पूर्ण केल्या गेले आहे. एक चांगला लेख असणे ही अ-दर्जासाठीची आवश्यकता नाही. More detailed criteria The article meets the अ-श्रेणीचे निकष: विकिपीडिया:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Assessment/A-Class criteria	Very useful to readers. A fairly complete treatment of the subject. A non-expert in the subject matter would typically find nothing wanting.	Expert knowledge may be needed to tweak the article, and style issues may need addressing. Peer-review may help.	साचा:Oldid (as of October 2008)
उत्तम	या लेखाने उत्तम लेखाचा दर्जा प्राप्त केला आहे. More detailed criteria हा लेख चांगल्या लेखाच्या निकषापर्यंत पोचतो:विकिपीडिया:Good article criteria	Useful to nearly all readers, with no obvious problems; approaching (although not equalling) the quality of a professional encyclopedia.	Some editing by subject and style experts is helpful; comparison with an existing featured article on a similar topic may highlight areas where content is weak or missing.	साचा:Oldid (as of May 2009)
ब	हा लेख good article standards पर्यंत जवळपास पोचला आहे व त्यात निवारण्याजोग्या काही मोठ्या बाबी नाहीत, पण त्या निकषापर्यंत पोचण्यास यावर थोडे अधिक काम करावे लागेल. More detailed criteria The article meets the six B-Class criteria:विकिपीडिया:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Assessment/B-Class criteria	Readers are not left wanting, although the content may not be complete enough to satisfy a serious student or researcher.	A few aspects of content and style need to be addressed, and expert knowledge is increasingly needed. The inclusion of supporting materials should also be considered if practical, and the article checked for general compliance with the manual of style and related style guidelines.	साचा:Oldid (as of September 2007)
क	हा लेख बराच उद्बोधक आहे पण त्यात महत्त्वाचा आशय नाही अथवा, त्यात बरीच असंबंधीत सामग्री आहे. या लेखास खात्रीलायक स्रोतांपासून काही संदर्भांची आवश्यकता आहे. यात अनेक इतर बाबींही असू शकतात तसेच याच्या स्वच्छतेची आवश्यकता आहे. More detailed criteria The article is better developed in style, structure and quality than Start-Class, but fails one or more of the criteria for B-Class. It may have some gaps or missing elements; need editing for clarity, balance or flow; or contain policy violations such as bias or original research. Articles on fictional topics are likely to be marked as C-Class if they are written from an in-universe perspective.	Useful to a casual reader, but would not provide a complete picture for even a moderately detailed study.	Considerable editing is needed to close gaps in content and address cleanup issues.	साचा:Oldid (as of June 2008)
प्राथमिक	An article that is developing, but which is quite incomplete and, most notably, lacks adequate reliable sources. More detailed criteria The article has a usable amount of good content, but it is weak in many areas, usually in referencing. Quality of the prose may be distinctly unencyclopedic, and MoS compliance non-existent; but the article should satisfy fundamental content policies such as notability and BLP, and provide enough sources to establish verifiability. No Start-Class article should be in any danger of being speedily deleted.	Provides some meaningful content, but the majority of readers will need more.	Provision of references to reliable sources should be prioritised; the article will also need substantial improvements in content and organisation.	साचा:Oldid (as of November 2006)
खुंटलेल्या	A very basic description of the topic. More detailed criteria The article is either a very short article or a rough collection of information that will need much work to become a meaningful article. It is usually very short, but if the material is irrelevant or incomprehensible, an article of any length falls into this category.	Provides very little meaningful content; may be little more than a dictionary definition.	Any editing or additional material can be helpful. The provision of meaningful content should be a priority.	साचा:Oldid (as of July 2009)
वृत्तलेखयादी	The article has attained featured list status. More detailed criteria The article meets the featured list criteria:विकिपीडिया:Featured list criteria	Professional standard; it comprehensively covers the defined scope, usually providing a complete set of items, and has annotations that provide useful and appropriate information about those items.	No further content additions should be necessary unless new information becomes available.	साचा:Oldid (as of February 2009)
यादी	Meets the criteria of a stand-alone list, which is an article that contains primarily a list, usually consisting of links to articles in a particular subject area.	There is no set format for a list, but its organization should be logical and useful to the reader.	Lists should be lists of live links to Wikipedia articles, appropriately named and organized.	साचा:Oldid (as of June 2007)

For a list of articles so classified, see the Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Food and drink articles by quality page (both quality and importance are reflected in the table).

Taskforce example

{{Article classification
 |project    = Herbs and Spices
 |task_force = yes
  |tf_link   = Herbs and Spices task force
  |parent    = Food and drink
  |tf_name   = Herbs and Spices
 |template   = Food and drink
 |nocat      = yes
}}

will generate:

Parent WikiProject - WikiProject Herbs and Spices

Taskforce Link - Herbs and Spices Taskforce

This page categorizes pages using assessment grades, through built-in transclusion from {{WikiProject Food and drink}}.

Information on Grading Scheme

मराठी विकिपीडिया लेख गुणवत्ता प्रतवारी योजना

दर्जा	निकष	वाचकांचे अनुभव	संपादनासाठी सूचना/सुचवण्या	उदाहरण
वृत्तलेख	या लेखाने featured article चा दर्जा प्राप्त केला आहे. More detailed criteria हा लेख वृत्तलेख निकष या दर्जापर्यंत पोचतो:विकिपीडिया:Featured article criteria	Professional, outstanding, and thorough; a definitive source for encyclopedic information.	No further content additions should be necessary unless new information becomes available; further improvements to the prose quality are often possible.	साचा:Oldid (as of March 2009)
अ	हा लेख चांगल्या प्रकारे संयोजित केला आहे व तो पूर्ण झाला आहे. त्याचे पुनरावलोकन हे इतर ठिकाणच्या निष्पक्ष समीक्षकांद्वारे पूर्ण केल्या गेले आहे. एक चांगला लेख असणे ही अ-दर्जासाठीची आवश्यकता नाही. More detailed criteria The article meets the अ-श्रेणीचे निकष: विकिपीडिया:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Assessment/A-Class criteria	Very useful to readers. A fairly complete treatment of the subject. A non-expert in the subject matter would typically find nothing wanting.	Expert knowledge may be needed to tweak the article, and style issues may need addressing. Peer-review may help.	साचा:Oldid (as of October 2008)
उत्तम	या लेखाने उत्तम लेखाचा दर्जा प्राप्त केला आहे. More detailed criteria हा लेख चांगल्या लेखाच्या निकषापर्यंत पोचतो:विकिपीडिया:Good article criteria	Useful to nearly all readers, with no obvious problems; approaching (although not equalling) the quality of a professional encyclopedia.	Some editing by subject and style experts is helpful; comparison with an existing featured article on a similar topic may highlight areas where content is weak or missing.	साचा:Oldid (as of May 2009)
ब	हा लेख good article standards पर्यंत जवळपास पोचला आहे व त्यात निवारण्याजोग्या काही मोठ्या बाबी नाहीत, पण त्या निकषापर्यंत पोचण्यास यावर थोडे अधिक काम करावे लागेल. More detailed criteria The article meets the six B-Class criteria:विकिपीडिया:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Assessment/B-Class criteria	Readers are not left wanting, although the content may not be complete enough to satisfy a serious student or researcher.	A few aspects of content and style need to be addressed, and expert knowledge is increasingly needed. The inclusion of supporting materials should also be considered if practical, and the article checked for general compliance with the manual of style and related style guidelines.	साचा:Oldid (as of September 2007)
क	हा लेख बराच उद्बोधक आहे पण त्यात महत्त्वाचा आशय नाही अथवा, त्यात बरीच असंबंधीत सामग्री आहे. या लेखास खात्रीलायक स्रोतांपासून काही संदर्भांची आवश्यकता आहे. यात अनेक इतर बाबींही असू शकतात तसेच याच्या स्वच्छतेची आवश्यकता आहे. More detailed criteria The article is better developed in style, structure and quality than Start-Class, but fails one or more of the criteria for B-Class. It may have some gaps or missing elements; need editing for clarity, balance or flow; or contain policy violations such as bias or original research. Articles on fictional topics are likely to be marked as C-Class if they are written from an in-universe perspective.	Useful to a casual reader, but would not provide a complete picture for even a moderately detailed study.	Considerable editing is needed to close gaps in content and address cleanup issues.	साचा:Oldid (as of June 2008)
प्राथमिक	An article that is developing, but which is quite incomplete and, most notably, lacks adequate reliable sources. More detailed criteria The article has a usable amount of good content, but it is weak in many areas, usually in referencing. Quality of the prose may be distinctly unencyclopedic, and MoS compliance non-existent; but the article should satisfy fundamental content policies such as notability and BLP, and provide enough sources to establish verifiability. No Start-Class article should be in any danger of being speedily deleted.	Provides some meaningful content, but the majority of readers will need more.	Provision of references to reliable sources should be prioritised; the article will also need substantial improvements in content and organisation.	साचा:Oldid (as of November 2006)
खुंटलेल्या	A very basic description of the topic. More detailed criteria The article is either a very short article or a rough collection of information that will need much work to become a meaningful article. It is usually very short, but if the material is irrelevant or incomprehensible, an article of any length falls into this category.	Provides very little meaningful content; may be little more than a dictionary definition.	Any editing or additional material can be helpful. The provision of meaningful content should be a priority.	साचा:Oldid (as of July 2009)
वृत्तलेखयादी	The article has attained featured list status. More detailed criteria The article meets the featured list criteria:विकिपीडिया:Featured list criteria	Professional standard; it comprehensively covers the defined scope, usually providing a complete set of items, and has annotations that provide useful and appropriate information about those items.	No further content additions should be necessary unless new information becomes available.	साचा:Oldid (as of February 2009)
यादी	Meets the criteria of a stand-alone list, which is an article that contains primarily a list, usually consisting of links to articles in a particular subject area.	There is no set format for a list, but its organization should be logical and useful to the reader.	Lists should be lists of live links to Wikipedia articles, appropriately named and organized.	साचा:Oldid (as of June 2007)

For a list of articles so classified, see the Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Herbs and Spices articles by quality page (both quality and importance are reflected in the table).

See also

प्रमाणित दर्जांचे प्रकार
वृत्तलेख	वृत्तलेखयादी	वृत्तलेखमाध्यम	अ
{{class|वृत्तलेख}}	{{class|वृत्तलेखयादी}}	{{class|वृत्तलेखमाध्यम}}	{{class|अ}}
उत्तम	ब	क	प्राथमिक
{{class|उत्तम}}	{{class|ब}}	{{class|क}}	{{class|प्राथमिक}}
खुंटलेल्या	यादी	अ-लेख	अमुल्यांकीत
{{class|खुंटलेल्या}}	{{class|यादी}}	{{class|अ-लेख}}	{{class|अमुल्यांकीत}}
अ-प्रमाणित दर्जांचे प्रकार
सद्य	भविष्य	संचअनुक्रमलेख
{{class|सद्य}}	{{class|भविष्य}}	{{class|संचअनुक्रमलेख}}
अ यादी	ब यादी	क यादी	प्राथमिक यादी
{{class|अ यादी}}	{{class|ब यादी}}	{{class|क यादी}}	{{class|प्राथमिक यादी}}
पुस्तक	वर्ग	निःसंदिग्धीकरण	मसूदा
{{class|पुस्तक}}	{{class|वर्ग}}	{{class|निःसंदिग्धीकरण}}	{{class|मसूदा}}
संचिका	विलयन	हवे	दालन
{{class|संचिका}}	{{class|विलयन}}	{{class|हवे}}	{{class|दालन}}
प्रकल्प	पुनर्निर्देशन	साचा	सदस्य
{{class|प्रकल्प}}	{{class|पुनर्निर्देशन}}	{{class|साचा}}	{{class|सदस्य}}
प्रकारानुसार महत्त्व
उच्चतम	उच्च	मध्यम	निम्न
{{importance|उच्चतम}}	{{importance|उच्च}}	{{importance|मध्यम}}	{{importance|निम्न}}
निम्नतर	अप्राप्त	अज्ञात
{{importance|निम्नतर}}	{{importance|अप्राप्त}}	{{importance|अज्ञात}}

Class

• {{Article classification}}
• {{Grading scheme}}
• {{Assessment Class Summary}}
• {{Category class}}
• {{Articles by Quality}}
• {{Class}}
• {{Class/colour}}
• {{Class/icon}}

Importance

• {{Article importance}}
• {{Importance scheme}}
• {{Assessment Importance Summary}}
• {{Category importance}} / {{Cat priority}}
• {{Articles by Importance}}
• {{Importance}}
• {{Importance/colour}}
• {{Importance/icon}}

Hybrid

• {{Articles by Quality and Importance}}

Others

• {{Articles by Quality Pie Graph}}
• {{Articles by Importance Pie Graph}}
• {{WikiProject progression rainbow}}
• {{WikiProject assessment progression}}

Tool to add multiple templates to quality assessment pages

• {{WPBannerMeta/templatepage/qualheader |project =|topic =}}