"व्याकरण" च्या विविध आवृत्यांमधील फरक
Content deleted Content added
छो r2.6.4) (सांगकाम्याने वाढविले: rw:Ikibonezamvugo |
छो →व्याकरणांचा विकास: शुद्धलेखन दुरुस्त्या, replaced: महत्वा → महत्त्वा using AWB |
||
ओळ ३४:
Grammars evolve through usage and also due to separations of the human population. With the advent of written [[Knowledge representation|representations]], formal rules about language usage tend to appear also. Formal grammars are [[codification (linguistics)|codifications]] of usage that are developed by repeated documentation over time, and by [[observation]] as well.जसेजसे,नियम प्रस्थापित झाले व त्यांचा विकास होउ लागला,व्याकरणदृष्ट्या बरोबर prescriptiveमुद्दयाचा उद्भव होउ शकतो. As the rules become established and developed, the prescriptive concept of grammatical correctness can arise. This often creates a discrepancy between contemporary usage and that which has been accepted, over time, as being correct. Linguists tend to believe that prescriptive grammars do not have any justification beyond their authors' aesthetic tastes; however, prescriptions are considered in [[sociolinguistics]] as part of the explanation for why some people say "I didn't do nothing", some say "I didn't do anything", and some say one or the other depending on social context.
व्याकरणाचा अभ्यास हा शिक्षणाचा
[[Constructed language]]s (also called planned languages or conlangs) are more common in the modern day. Many have been designed to aid human [[communication]] (for example, naturalistic [[Interlingua]], schematic [[Esperanto]], and the highly logic-compatible artificial language [[Lojban]]). Each of these languages has its own grammar.
|