"विकिपीडिया:तटस्थ दृष्टीकोन" च्या विविध आवृत्यांमधील फरक
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary |
|||
ओळ ९७:
A special case is the expression of aesthetic opinions. Some विकिपीडिया articles about art, artists, and other creative topics (e.g. musicians, actors, books, etc.) have tended toward the effusive. This is out of place in an encyclopedia; we might not be able to agree that so-and-so is the greatest guitar player in history. But it is important indeed to note how some artist or some work has been received by the general public or by prominent experts. Providing an overview of the common interpretations of a creative work, preferably with citations or references to notable individuals holding that interpretation, is appropriate. करिता instance, that Shakespeare is widely considered one of the greatest authors of the English language is a bit of knowledge that one should learn from an encyclopedia. Public and scholarly critique of an artist or work, when well-researched and verifiable, helps to put the work into context and enhances the credibility of the article; idiosyncratic opinions of individual विकिपीडिया contributors, however, do not.
==
===
<!-- Subsection link: referenced from [[विकिपीडिया:Gaming the system]]-->
A common type of dispute occurs when an editor asserts that a fact is both [[WP:V|verifiable]] and [[WP:CITE|cited]], and should therefore be included.
ओळ १०५:
*cited selectively
*painted by words more favorably or negatively than is appropriate
*made to look more important or more dubious than a निष्पक्ष
*subject to other factors suggestive of bias
[[WP:V|Verifiability]] is only one content criterion. तटस्थ दृष्टीकोन is a core policy of विकिपीडिया, mandatory, non-negotiable, and to be followed in all articles. Concerns related to undue weight, non-निष्पक्ष fact selection and wording, and advancing a personal
===POV forks===
A ''POV fork'' is an attempt to evade the निष्पक्षता policy by creating a new article about a certain subject that is already treated in an article, often to avoid or highlight negative or positive viewpoints or facts. This is generally considered unacceptable. The generally accepted policy is that all facts and major points of
:''See the guideline [[विकिपीडिया:Content forking]] for clarification on the issues raised in this section.''
| |||