"विकिपीडिया:तटस्थ दृष्टीकोन" च्या विविध आवृत्यांमधील फरक

*'''Alternative theoretical formulations''': Alternative theoretical formulations from within the [[scientific community]], such as [[Modified Newtonian Dynamics]] as opposed to [[dark matter]], are not pseudoscience, but part of the scientific process. While an alternative theoretical formulation may be looked on with derision, it is still published in reasonably respectable [[scientific journal]]s, and negative responses will usually attack it for failure to explain some aspect of reality, which researchers into the alternative theoretical formulation will attempt to correct. करिता instance, the theory of [[continental drift]] had quite a lot of evidence, but was heavily criticised because there was no known mechanism for continents to move, and thus such evidence was dismissed. When such a mechanism was discovered, it became mainstream as [[plate tectonics]]. However, pseudoscience usually requires rewriting basic, well-tested laws of science for it to work, without any evidence other than anecdotal evidence or weak statistical evidence at just above the level of detection (Examples: [[parapsychology]] and [[homeopathy]]).

 

{{Shortcut|WP:RNPOV}}

 

Some adherents of a religion might object to a critical historical treatment of their own faith because in their view such analysis discriminates against their religious beliefs. Their point of view must be mentioned if it can be documented by notable, reliable sources, yet note that there is no contradiction. तटस्थता निती means that विकिपीडिया editors ought to try to write sentences like this: "Certain adherents of this faith (say which) believe X, and also believe that they have always believed X; however, due to the findings (say which) of modern historians and archaeologists (say which), other adherents (say which) of this faith now believe Z."