३३,१२७
संपादने
"विकिपीडिया:(छाया)चित्र, माध्यम संचिकांचे प्रताधिकार, उचित वापर अपवाद, परीघ आणि जोखीम" च्या विविध आवृत्यांमधील फरक
विकिपीडिया:(छाया)चित्र, माध्यम संचिकांचे प्रताधिकार, उचित वापर अपवाद, परीघ आणि जोखीम (संपादन)
१५:५४, १० मे २०१५ ची आवृत्ती
, ५ वर्षांपूर्वीबदलांचा आढावा नाही
|
{{Collapse bottom}}
* एखाद्याकडून प्रताधिकार कायद्याचे सरसकट उल्लंघन होत असेल तर पूर्ण जोखीम शिल्लक राहते.▼
* "....The expression `Property' in Art.300A confined not to land alone, it includes intangibles like copyrights and other intellectual property and embraces every possible interest recognised by law. ..." परिच्छेद ११० (K.T. Plantation Pvt. Ltd. & Anr vs State Of Karnataka on 9 August, 2011) Article 300A:Persons not to be deprived of property save by authority of law. निकालाचा परिच्छेद १२२ मधून ".... At this stage, we may clarify that there is a difference between "no" compensation and "nil" compensation..."; ".... A law seeking to acquire private property for public purpose cannot say that "no compensation shall be paid". However, there could be a law awarding "nil" compensation...." ▼
▲* "....The expression `Property' in Art.300A confined not to land alone, it includes intangibles like copyrights and other intellectual property and embraces every possible interest recognised by law. ..." परिच्छेद ११० (K.T. Plantation Pvt. Ltd. & Anr vs State Of Karnataka on 9 August, 2011) <ref>http://indiankanoon.org/doc/1524072/</ref> Article 300A:Persons not to be deprived of property save by authority of law. निकालाचा परिच्छेद १२२ मधून ".... At this stage, we may clarify that there is a difference between "no" compensation and "nil" compensation..."; ".... A law seeking to acquire private property for public purpose cannot say that "no compensation shall be paid". However, there could be a law awarding "nil" compensation...." सोबत पहा परिच्छेद "१४२ Let the message, therefore, be loud and clear, that rule of law exists in this country even when we interpret a statute, which has the blessings of Article 300A...." १४३ (e) "....and the right to claim compensation is also inbuilt in that Article 300A..."<ref>http://indiankanoon.org/doc/1524072/</ref> अशा केसेसमध्ये जिथे एकदा प्रताधिकार उल्लंघन झाल्याचे न्यायालय स्विकारते तेथे न्यायालयाचा दृष्टीकोण एकवेळ सौम्य होऊ शकेल पण जोखीम पुर्णत्वाने संपणार नाही असे वाटते का ?
▲* एखाद्याकडून प्रताधिकार कायद्याचे सरसकट उल्लंघन होत असेल तर पूर्ण जोखीम शिल्लक राहते.
| |||